Policy     Economics     Technologies

The printerless office

A study into the use of e-readers as a substitute for printed paper

Whether or not use of an e-reader in an office environment is environmentally friendlier than printed paper depends entirely on the type of user. In this study lifecycle assessment was used to determine the respective environmental impact of e-readers and printed paper and establish the tipping point at which the impact of a certain number of prints equals that of e-reader use. Because the precise composition of an e-reader (with e-ink) is proprietary information, scenarios were used for this purpose. The tipping point at which an e-reader, with an assumed service life of 2 years, is environmentally friendlier than prints is between 3,000 and 13,000 prints a year. It therefore depend on the office situation what the best option is.

Authors CE

Marijn Bijleveld

Delft, March 2011

report (Dutch)

This publication is only available in Dutch.

Tweets by @cedelft

Waarom kiezen voor de planeconomie? Column Frans Rooijers over Klimaat- en Energieakkoord #energieakkoord op Energi… https://t.co/S4PPQTlB8z
13-12-2017 09:55

Article - Evaluating the environmental impact of debit card payments https://t.co/IfnNwC3p0b
07-12-2017 16:23

Rapport Net voor de Toekomst - scenario's voor investeringskeuzes van netbeheerders in infrastructuren https://t.co/W4mUsLCuZ0
07-12-2017 16:04

Gezamenlijke visie om Omgevingswet, regionale energiestrategie en warmtetransitieplan lokaal gelijk te gebruiken… https://t.co/YwHhzl338d
06-12-2017 16:30

Position paper @CEDelft t.b.v. hoorzitting/rondetafelgesprek Kunststofketen en zwerfafval Tweede Kamer d.d. 30 nove… https://t.co/fLEooSyZL6
30-11-2017 12:32